Can you guarantee rankings or AI citations?
No. Anyone who promises specific rankings is selling vapor. I commit to the work and the methodology, not specific outcomes. After the 6-month initial term the engagement is month-to-month with cancel-anytime terms. If the work isn't producing value, you stop paying. That's a stronger guarantee than a refund clause.
Do you use AI to write the content?
Yes, openly. AI handles drafting and research. Editing, fact-checking, voice match, and final approval go through me. AI is leverage, not a replacement. Hidden AI use found out kills trust. Disclosed AI use is respected by serious buyers, and the alternative is paying $8K - 25K/month for an agency pretending otherwise.
Why only 6 pieces a month?
Six well-built pieces beat thirty generic ones, every time. Volume is a vanity metric. The companies winning in 2026 publish less and think harder. Two flagships and four shorter pieces, every one earning its place. That's the model.
How long until I see results?
Visible movement on tracked questions usually starts in months 2 - 3. Meaningful movement compounds over months 3 - 6 as content gets indexed, cited, and reinforced. Less than 90 days isn't a fair test of the methodology. Buyers who can't commit to that mindset are filtered out before signing.
Why $3,000 a month?
One flat rate for the full program: six pieces a month, link-building outreach, landing-page optimization, ICP work, and a featured placement on AI Tools Bakery. Enterprise-focused agencies charge $8K to $25K a month for less. If $3,000 feels too high, the program likely isn't right for the company yet.
Is there a minimum commitment?
Yes, a 6-month initial term, because AI search visibility compounds over months, not weeks, and less than that isn't a fair test of the work. After the first six months it's month-to-month, cancel any time. The content plan itself still refreshes every month, so the work can always pivot when something needs to.
How is this different from regular SEO?
Traditional SEO optimizes for ranking in Google's blue-link results. This optimizes for being cited inside the answers AI engines generate, while still earning Google rankings on the shorter pieces. Different surfaces, different ranking factors, different content forms. They overlap and reinforce each other when run together. Neither replaces the other.
What if my industry has low AI search volume?
AI search volume in your category matters less than you'd expect. The query mapping finds the buyer-intent questions that exist in your specific niche, not the head-terms with mass volume. Even small B2B categories have buyers asking ChatGPT for recommendations now. What changes is the absolute number of clicks, not whether the methodology works. If your category is truly tiny (under 10K addressable buyers globally), I'll say so on the discovery call rather than take the engagement.
What if I want to cancel?
After the 6-month initial term, cancel any month with no notice and no penalties. You keep every deliverable produced to date. No retroactive charges. The ICP map, query map, gap report, content plan, and every piece published are yours.
Can I work with you alongside my existing SEO agency?
Yes, and most clients should. The work operates on different surfaces and reinforces traditional SEO when coordinated. Your SEO agency handles Google ranking on existing pages. I handle new content built for both Google and AI engines. I'll brief them on what I'm publishing where so the playbooks line up. The only friction comes when an SEO agency claims they "already do this" but doesn't have a documented methodology. That's usually a sign they're conflating it with something they already do.
Why aren't there more case studies yet?
Because Zilwaris is new and I cap at 6 active clients. The published case study is from a parallel engagement on an AI image generation tool. The first B2B SaaS case studies publish once those engagements hit 90 days of measured movement. I'd rather have one honest case study with the disclaimer attached than ten polished ones that overstate what's possible.
